TillyBoard vs Studiovity

AI-assisted pre-production platform for filmmakers, screenwriters and production houses, from screenplay to breakdown, schedule, shot list, storyboard, call sheet and budget. This page sets out what Studiovity is built for and what TillyBoard is built for, without claiming anything about features we cannot evidence.

What Studiovity is for

AI-assisted pre-production platform for filmmakers, screenwriters and production houses, from screenplay to breakdown, schedule, shot list, storyboard, call sheet and budget.

Script-led productions that want writing, AI breakdown and scheduling in one suite with mobile apps.

Tools that grew out of screenwriting think in scenes and pages. That fits narrative film and fits commercials or corporate work less well, where the starting point is not a script but a brief with an audience, a message and a deadline.

Where Studiovity is strong

A comparison that only lists your own upsides is not one. This is what speaks for Studiovity:

  • Broad suite from screenplay to call sheet and budget on one platform
  • Native apps for iOS and Android with offline access
  • AI breakdown and AI storyboard straight from the script

Where the limits are

And these are the points where teams run into limits in practice — not as a flaw, but as a consequence of the design:

  • No moodboard or video review module in its product list
  • The workflow starts at the screenplay, which commercial briefs rarely come with

Where TillyBoard takes a different route

Studiovity starts at the screenplay; TillyBoard starts at the brief and adds a moodboard canvas and video review in the same project.

TillyBoard turns a brief into a shoot-ready package: shot list, storyboard, schedule and call sheet that stay connected. Change the creative direction and the affected shots are flagged rather than quietly left behind.

Which tool when

In short: Script-led productions that want writing, AI breakdown and scheduling in one suite with mobile apps. If your bottleneck is instead getting from a brief to a plan that holds, that is where TillyBoard starts.

The useful question before switching is not which tool does more, but where the process stalls today. Three bottlenecks come up again and again in production teams, and they call for different tools:

  • The plan comes together too slowly: days pass between the brief and a shoot-ready shot list, with the client already chasing.
  • The paperwork drifts apart: shot list, schedule and call sheet live in three files, and after the second change none of them agrees with the others.
  • Distribution eats the time: the plan is done, but every version has to be sent to twenty people by hand and chased up.

What to check before switching

For script-led films the screenplay can stay where it is; the visual and day-to-day planning moves.

Switching tools mid-production almost always costs more than it saves on that job. The sensible moment is between two projects, with a pilot small enough to run twice if it comes to that. Check first whether the export formats match what post and accounting expect — migrations fail there more often than on features.

Frequently asked

Is TillyBoard a replacement for Studiovity?

That depends on what you use Studiovity for. Studiovity starts at the screenplay; TillyBoard starts at the brief and adds a moodboard canvas and video review in the same project.

Can both be used together?

Usually yes. TillyBoard exports shot lists, schedules and call sheets as PDF and the schedule also as CSV; the Enterprise plan adds a REST API. Downstream systems can carry on from there.